Hyaluronic Acid in Lip Care: Why It May Be Working Against Your Lips

Lip physiology, pH sensitivity, and why water-binding ingredients can worsen dryness on the lips

Hyaluronic Acid in Lip Care: Why It May Be Working Against Your Lips

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely regarded as one of the safest and most effective hydrating ingredients in modern skincare. On facial skin, its ability to bind water can visibly improve hydration, smoothness, and comfort. As a result, it has become a staple ingredient not only in serums and creams, but increasingly in lip balms, lip masks, and lip treatments.

However, lips are not simply “thin skin.” The vermillion zone has a unique anatomy: it lacks oil and sweat glands, contains very little endogenous lipid content, and has a limited ability to buffer environmental and chemical stress. These differences fundamentally change how ingredients behave on the lips compared to the rest of the face.

Summary
|Manuela Valenti

When HA is applied to lips, especially in water-heavy or mildly acidic formulations, the outcome is often very different from what consumers expect. Rather than supporting long-term comfort, repeated application can contribute to increased dryness, tightness, and barrier stress, particularly when HA is used as a primary hydrating strategy rather than as a secondary component supported by lipids and occlusives.

From a lip-specific physiological and formulation perspective, hyaluronic acid may work well for skin but poorly suited for lip care. Biologically it does not meet the structural needs of the lips.

Lips Are Not Skin: Why Lip Biology Changes Everything

The anatomy of the vermillion

The vermillion zone of the lips is structurally distinct from facial skin and should not be treated as a simplified extension of it. Lips lack sebaceous glands and sweat glands, meaning they are unable to produce surface lipids or natural moisturizing factors through eccrine secretion. This absence alone places lips at a constant disadvantage in maintaining hydration and barrier integrity.

Additionally, the stratum corneum of the lips is thin, incomplete, or intermittently absent depending on the region. Corneocyte cohesionthe glue holding dead skin cells together — is weaker, and intercellular lipid organization is minimal compared to facial skin. As a result, the lip epithelium has a reduced capacity to regulate water flux and protect itself from environmental and chemical stressors.

Low endogenous lipid content — fats the body makes itself — further compromises the lips’ ability to retain moisture. Unlike facial skin, which can compensate for water-binding ingredients with its own lipid matrix, lips are almost entirely dependent on externally applied occlusives and emollients.

Why lips dry out faster than facial skin

Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) is significantly higher on the lips than on most areas of the face and body. Without sebaceous activity or a robust lipid barrier, water evaporates rapidly from the lip surface, even under mild environmental conditions.

Lips also exhibit limited self-repair capacity. Barrier disruption accumulates quickly, while recovery is slow and often incomplete without targeted lipid support. This makes lips especially sensitive to repeated formulation stress, frequent product changes, and ingredients that emphasize hydration without barrier reinforcement.

As a result, lips rely almost entirely on external occlusion to maintain comfort. Any formulation that fails to prioritize occlusion risks exacerbating dryness rather than alleviating it.

How HA Actually Works

Humectant, not barrier-repairing

HA is a hygroscopic polymer that binds water through hydrogen bonding. Its primary cosmetic function is humectancy: attracting and holding water within a formulation or at the surface of the tissue.

What HA does not do is repair or replace intercellular lipids. It does not integrate into the lipid matrix, does not restore lamellar structure, and does not meaningfully reduce TEWL on its own. Unless chemically modified, it also does not form a persistent film capable of acting as an occlusive barrier.

On lipid-rich facial skin, this limitation is often compensated for by endogenous sebum and surrounding lipid content. On lips, that compensation does not exist.

Why HA performs well on skin but not poorly on lips

Facial skin benefits from multiple buffering systems: sebaceous lipids, a thicker stratum corneum, and a more robust acid mantle. In this environment, HA can enhance hydration without significantly destabilizing barrier function.

Lips, by contrast, lack these protective systems. When HA binds water on the lip surface without accompanying lipid reinforcement, the bound water is highly susceptible to evaporation. Once evaporation occurs, the local water gradient can actually increase dehydration of the underlying tissue.

This is why HA can feel initially comforting on the lips, yet fail to provide sustained benefit.

The pH Problem in Lip Care Formulators Forgot About

Why lips are highly sensitive to pH shifts

The lip epithelium has a limited ability to buffer acidic or alkaline exposure. Unlike facial skin, which maintains a relatively stable acid mantle, lips are frequently exposed to fluctuating pH from saliva, food, and beverages.

Repeated exposure to products outside a narrow near-neutral pH range can increase epithelial stress, compromise corneocyte cohesion, and contribute to irritant cheilitis. This sensitivity applies to both acidic and alkaline formulations, though acidic systems are more common in modern cosmetic products.

Typical pH of hyaluronic acid systems

Many HA formulations are adjusted to mildly acidic pH ranges (approximately 4.5–5.5) to optimize polymer stability and shelf life. While this pH range is generally well tolerated on facial skin, it may be suboptimal for prolonged or repeated exposure on the lips.

When HA-based lip products are used frequently or left on overnight, this sustained pH exposure may contribute to subclinical irritation and cumulative barrier fatigue. The issue is not acute damage, but low-grade stress over time.

Short Residence Time and the Rehydration–Dehydration Cycle

Why HA does not stay on the lips

HA is water-soluble and easily displaced. On lips, it is rapidly removed through normal activities such as talking, eating, licking, and swallowing. Saliva alone is sufficient to dissolve and redistribute HA within minutes to an hour, depending on multiple factors.

This short residence time severely limits HA’s functional relevance on the lips, particularly during daytime use. During sleep, however, prolonged exposure to water-based, mildly acidic systems can contribute to dehydration rather than repair.

Repeated wet–dry cycles and barrier fatigue

Frequent reapplication of hydro-based HA products creates repeated wet–dry cycles on the lips. These cycles are mechanically and osmotically stressful, similar in effect to habitual lip licking.

Over time, this pattern can weaken barrier resilience and promote chronic dryness rather than relief. The lips may feel temporarily hydrated but become increasingly dependent on reapplication, reinforcing a cycle of discomfort.

Night Masks: When Exposure Time Becomes a Risk Factor

Prolonged hydration without lipid support

Overnight application increases ingredient contact time from minutes to several hours. Prolonged hydration increases epithelial permeability, particularly in tissue already lacking lipid reinforcement.

When HA is used as a primary overnight hydrating agent without sufficient occlusion, the lips may experience increased water loss once the product dissipates or is removed.

Why lips may feel worse over time

Users often report tightness, flaking, and heightened sensitivity after prolonged use of HA-based lip masks. While these effects are rarely attributed directly to hyaluronic acid, the mechanism aligns with barrier fatigue driven by hydration without lipid protection.

This presentation is subtle and chronic, which is why it is often overlooked or misattributed.

Why This Issue Is Rarely Discussed

HA has a reputation as a universally “safe” ingredient, and few are willing to question its use.

HA is widely perceived as inert and universally beneficial. This reputation discourages critical evaluation of tissue-specific suitability, particularly in areas like the lips that are underrepresented in clinical studies.

Lip discomfort caused by formulation mismatch rarely presents as an acute adverse reaction. Instead, it manifests as ongoing dryness, sensitivity, or dependence on frequent reapplication. These effects are typically blamed on climate, habits, or personal predisposition rather than formulation design.

What Lips Actually Need Instead

Lipid-rich, occlusive-first strategies

Effective lip care prioritizes occlusion and lipid replenishment. Ingredients that reduce TEWL and compensate for the absence of sebaceous glands are foundational to long-term lip comfort and resilience.

Humectants may play a secondary role in lip care when:

  • pH is near neutral
  • Strong occlusives dominate the formulation
  • Humectants are present at low, supportive levels

They should not be the primary strategy for lip hydration.

Why Sticking to Natural Waxes and Butters is Best

Based on lip-specific physiology, naturally balanced lip balms built around occlusion and lipid support — rather than water-driven hydration — resolve many of these issues.

In our formulations, beeswax plays a central role as a breathable occlusive that adheres well to the lip surface, reduces TWL, and provides structural persistence without the brittleness associated with some synthetic waxes.

Beeswax is complemented by lip-supportive lipids, such as plant butters and oils rich in fatty acids structurally compatible with the lip epithelium. These lipids help compensate for the complete absence of sebaceous activity on the lips, improving flexibility, comfort, and barrier resilience over time. Unlike humectant-heavy systems, this approach minimizes repeated wet–dry cycles and supports sustained protection rather than transient hydration.

From a dermatological standpoint, occlusive and lipid-based strategies are consistently shown to be the most effective approach for reducing TEWL and managing dryness in barrier-compromised tissues, including the lips. Studies evaluating lip care and xerotic skin demonstrate that formulations emphasizing occlusion and emolliency outperform humectant-only systems in maintaining hydration and preventing irritation.

 


Tinted Lip Whip Soufflé — Cocoa butter + Vitamin E + Avocado oil

references
  1. Nong, Yvonne et al. “A review of the use of beeswax in skincare.”Journal of cosmetic dermatologyvol. 22,8 (2023): 2166-2173. doi:10.1111/jocd.15718
  2. Tamura, E et al. “The efficacy of a highly occlusive formulation for dry lips.” International journal of cosmetic science vol. 42,1 (2020): 46-52. doi:10.1111/ics.12583
  3. Bielfeldt S, Blaak J, Laing S, Schleißinger M, Theiss C, Wilhelm KP, Staib P. Deposition of plant lipids after single application of a lip care product determined by confocal raman spectroscopy, corneometry and transepidermal water-loss. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2019 Jun;41(3):281-291. doi: 10.1111/ics.12533. PMID: 31002377; PMCID: PMC6851866.

Related Articles

Inflammaging: The Silent Driver of Premature Skin Aging

Skincare

When Eczema Isn’t Eczema: The Overlooked Fungal Infections Behind Chronic Skin Rashes

Valenti's Journal

Vitamin C in Skincare: Forms, Benefits, and How to Choose the Right One

Cosmetology